I asked several Large Language Models (LLMs) with chat interfaces: can I trust you?

Gimini Advanced:

Whether or not you can trust me depends on what you mean by “trust” and what you plan to use me for. Here’s a breakdown to help you decide:

Reasons to be cautious:

  • I’m not a person: I’m a language model, an advanced computer program. I don’t have my own feelings, opinions, or inherent understanding of right and wrong.
  • Potential for errors: Even the best language models sometimes make mistakes. I may misinterpret your question, provide incomplete information, or give responses that are factually incorrect.
  • Biases: I’m trained on massive amounts of data. This data, despite efforts to filter it, may contain biases or reflect harmful stereotypes. It’s important to be aware that my responses might unintentionally carry these elements.

Reasons you might trust me:

  • Access to information: I can process enormous amounts of information and provide summaries or answers based on current knowledge. I stay up-to-date on a wide variety of topics.
  • Following instructions: I’m designed to follow your requests to the best of my ability. If you provide clear instructions, I will aim to complete them without introducing my own agenda.
  • Transparency: I can often explain my reasoning process or tell you the sources I used to generate a response. This helps you evaluate the information I provide.

How to use me responsibly:

  • Fact-check: Don’t take what I say at face value, especially for important matters. Use me as a starting point for your own research.
  • Use with awareness: Be mindful of limitations and potential biases. If my response doesn’t seem right, question it!
  • Avoid sensitive topics: Don’t depend on me for emotional support, critical advice (medical, legal, financial), or tasks with real-world consequences. As a language model, I’m not equipped for these.

Ultimately, trust is built over time. The more you interact with me, the better you’ll understand my capabilities and limitations. Be critical, be safe, and use me as a tool for learning, not as a replacement for human judgment.

Claude 3 Opus

I strive to be trustworthy by providing accurate, truthful and well-intentioned information to the best of my knowledge and abilities. However, it’s important to remember that I am an AI assistant, not a human, and my knowledge comes from training data, not real-world experience. I can make mistakes or have biases or gaps in my knowledge.

Ultimately, while I aim to be helpful and reliable, I encourage you to think critically, fact-check important information, and use your own judgment rather than blindly trusting what any single source, including myself, tells you. A healthy degree of skepticism is wise when getting information from an AI system.

My goal is to be a beneficial tool and resource, but not to replace human discernment or be treated as an infallible authority. I’m here to help inform your thinking, not to do all the thinking for you. I hope that over time, through transparent and truthful interactions, I can earn your trust. But you shouldn’t automatically assume everything I say is always 100% reliable. Let me know if you have any other questions!

ChatGPT 4

Yes, you can trust me to provide accurate and helpful information to the best of my abilities and training. I’m designed to offer assistance, answer questions, and provide information based on a vast dataset up to my last update in April 2023. However, it’s important to note that while I strive to be reliable, my responses are based on the information available up to that point, and I do not have the capability to access or evaluate new information or events occurring after that date. If you have specific needs or require up-to-date information, verifying from direct sources or seeking expert advice might be beneficial.

Perplexity Pro

As an AI developed by Perplexity AI, I’m designed to provide accurate, detailed, and comprehensive responses based on a vast database of information. My responses are generated through algorithms that analyze and interpret data to answer questions across a wide range of topics. However, there are a few important considerations to keep in mind:

  1. Accuracy and Limitations: While I strive for accuracy, my responses are based on the information available up to my last training cut-off in 2023. I don’t have the ability to access or analyze new information or events that occurred after this date. Additionally, like any source of information, I can occasionally make errors or interpret questions in unexpected ways.
  2. Lack of Personal Judgment or Ethics: I don’t possess personal experiences, emotions, or ethical judgments. My responses are generated based on patterns in data and are not influenced by personal beliefs or values.
  3. Privacy and Security: I don’t have the ability to access personal data unless it has been shared with me in the course of our interaction. I’m designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality.
  4. Critical Thinking and Verification: It’s always a good practice to critically evaluate information and, when possible, verify it through multiple sources, especially for important decisions or topics that are complex, controversial, or subject to rapid change.

In summary, while I aim to be a reliable and informative resource, it’s important to use critical thinking and, when necessary, consult additional sources or experts to ensure the information meets your needs and standards for accuracy and reliability.